You cannot calculate a dependable stand-up pouch size from product weight alone. Start with the product’s actual occupied volume and filling behaviour, then test candidate pouch structures while reserving the areas needed for opening, gripping and sealing.

Use the blank records below to document candidate dimensions and a sample plan. Confirm capacity and machine compatibility with physical samples.

Describe the product before the pouch

Record the intended fill mass, product condition and how the product settles after filling. Granules that pack tightly and bulky irregular pieces can occupy very different volumes at the same mass. If you use measured bulk density to estimate volume, record the measurement method and condition; do not borrow a density for a different product.

A useful preliminary relationship is volume equals mass divided by bulk density when the density measurement represents the actual filling state. That gives a product-volume estimate. The pouch shape, headspace and machine access still need physical assessment.

Open pouch filled with grains almost to its mouth, with a clear lower window
An open pouch filled almost to its mouth. This example makes the need to reserve opening and closing space visible; it is not an approved fill level.

Record the supplier’s dimension convention

Ask whether width and height describe the flat outside dimensions, and how the bottom gusset is stated. Identify seals, zipper, valve or spout separately. “Gusset” can be represented differently in drawings, so confirm its reference points rather than comparing catalogue labels alone.

Outline and usable regions differ
Outline and usable regions differ. Schematic, not to scale; use the actual supplier and machine drawings for dimensions.

The schematic separates the nominal outline from regions that need room for handling and closure. It is undimensioned because these regions depend on the actual pouch and machine. Do not treat the shaded area as a standard fill line.

Input How to obtain it Where it goes in the brief
Product amount Defined fill requirement Trial condition
Product volume Representative measurement or documented estimate Candidate sample selection
Pouch outline Supplier drawing with dimension convention Width, height and gusset fields
Grip and opening areas Machine integrator’s requirement Marked handling zones
Sealing area Pouch structure and closing operation Clear top region
Attachment footprint Valve, zipper or fitment drawing Exclusion and access review

Check the opening against the filling operation

Give the integrator the candidate samples, product description and drawing before assuming they fit the machine. Ask which surfaces the opening devices and grippers use, and what access the filling equipment needs. A pouch that holds the product when filled by hand may still be unsuitable for that sequence.

A local manufacturer source, ZONESUN’s ZS-AFS04W application description, identifies pouch samples, product behaviour and opening stability as inputs to selection. Its published dimensions apply to that model only. This guide deliberately uses no machine range as a universal pouch design rule. The source is the manufacturer’s premade-pouch description.

Account for attachments and the closed state

Round plastic valve on the front of a kraft pouch below its sealed top
A valve occupies part of the pouch wall below the top seal. Mark its actual footprint and position on the controlled drawing.

The valve-pouch detail shows an attachment occupying a flat wall. A valve may change where the pack can be handled; the supplier and integrator must confirm the actual constraints. Review the coffee valve case if that feature is part of the brief.

Close a representative filled sample by the intended method. Observe its settled shape, standing behaviour and the available code area. Record any fold, bulge or product migration near the closing region. Treat each observation as a sample result under the stated conditions, not an inherent property of the nominal size.

Complete a candidate-size record

Download the candidate record (CSV), product-measurement sheet (CSV) and sample-trial plan (CSV), or copy the blank tables below. Make one candidate record for each drawing revision. Link its measurement and trial IDs so an observation stays attached to the tested sample.

Product measurement record

Field Recorded value
Product, lot, condition and measurement ID ____________________
Target fill mass M (g) ____________________
Container ID, volume method and filling state ____________________
Container tare t (g) / gross sample mass b (g) ____________________
Net sample mass m = b − t (g) ____________________
Occupied sample volume v (mL) ____________________
Bulk density rho = m / v (g/mL) ____________________
Estimated target product volume V = M / rho (mL) ____________________
Direct volume of target mass, if measured (mL), and method ____________________
Operator, date and repeat-measurement IDs ____________________

Use positive masses and volumes, and retain individual measurements in the CSV rather than silently averaging different product states. For an arithmetic example only, an assumed 100 g sample occupying 200 mL gives rho = 0.5 g/mL; an assumed 250 g target then gives V = 500 mL. These assumed inputs demonstrate units, not a measured product or a pouch capacity. They give no pouch width, height, gusset or headspace allowance.

Candidate drawing and sample record

Field Recorded value
Candidate ID, supplier and material/lot reference ____________________
Drawing revision and physical sample IDs ____________________
Flat external W, left to right outside edges (mm) ____________________
Flat external H, top to bottom outside edges (mm) ____________________
Bottom gusset G (mm) and supplier’s measurement convention ____________________
View and coordinate origin agreed with supplier ____________________
Grip/opening contact and access envelopes: drawing reference, extents (mm) ____________________
Fill access and closure/seal/zipper: drawing reference, extents (mm) ____________________
Valve/fitment footprint, position and tolerance (mm) ____________________
Candidate selection reason and linked measurement IDs ____________________
Unknown dimension or constraint / responsible owner / due point ____________________

For a shared front-view overlay, you can propose x = 0 at the flat outside left edge and y = 0 at the outside top edge, with x increasing right and y downward. Confirm that convention before recording zone extents as x-min, x-max, y-min and y-max in millimetres. Keep the supplier’s gusset convention explicit: a folded depth and a fully opened depth are different references. Request candidate W/H/G from the supplier using the product record, then assess physical samples; the volume formula cannot generate those dimensions.

Sample-trial plan and result

Field Planned value / observed result
Trial ID, candidate/drawing revision, sample IDs and pouch lot ____________________
Product lot, condition and target mass (g) ____________________
Machine/configuration and setting-record reference ____________________
Sample quantity and planned opening/gripping/filling/closing checks ____________________
Acceptance criteria, units/method and responsible approver agreed before trial ____________________
Observed opening, grip/slip, spillage and closure condition; event counts and sample quantity ____________________
Settled pack dimensions (mm), standing behaviour and code-area observation ____________________
Photos, retained samples and measurement-record references ____________________
Decision / approver / date ____________________
Unresolved action / owner / due point ____________________

Leave results blank until the trial occurs. Record the actual setup, sample quantity and observations, including rejected samples; an unperformed check remains pending. The CSV separates planned checks from results and retains an action owner for unresolved work.

If a sample fails, change one relevant design variable where practical. A simultaneous change to width, film stiffness and filling speed makes it difficult to tell what solved the problem. Keep rejected samples for comparison and document the final approved combination.

The next step is a dimensioned handoff accepted by the pouch supplier and line integrator. The design for packaging machinery guide connects this sample-based sizing task with other package handling decisions.